First issue · About the project
We made a freepersonality test
It is called OpenJung. You can take the test and read your results for free, without creating an account.
OpenJung First article · Translated from Chinese
First, a word about personality tests
For many people, “personality test” means MBTI. But a four-letter result online does not necessarily come from the same test. 16Personalities and the official MBTI are two examples that are often mixed up.
OpenJung also gives a four-letter result. Before introducing it, we want to explain how some common tests differ, then why we built this site.
The descriptions below follow each system’s published explanation. This is not an accuracy ranking. Sources are linked after each entry.
Common personality tests
Similar names do not mean the questionnaires or results are the same.
MBTI
Four preference pairs, 16 types
MBTI stands for Myers–Briggs Type Indicator. It combines four preference pairs—Extraversion / Introversion, Sensing / Intuition, Thinking / Feeling, and Judging / Perceiving—into 16 types. That is where letters such as INFP and ESTJ come from. The official MBTI has its own questionnaire and interpretation process; not every four-letter test online is the official MBTI.
These words also have specific meanings. Thinking / Feeling, for example, concerns what people give weight to when making decisions, not whether they have feelings. Introversion / Extraversion is not a measure of social skill.
Definition source: Myers & Briggs Foundation · The preference pairs ↗
16Personalities
The NERIS model behind the colorful characters
16Personalities introduces 16 types with colorful characters and offers a free test. Its results look like MBTI, but it uses its own NERIS model: a four-letter format with reworked Big Five dimensions, rather than Jungian cognitive functions and their ordering.
The -A / -T at the end of a result comes from NERIS’s fifth dimension, which the official MBTI does not have. Different results on the two sites do not necessarily mean a calculation is wrong: the questions and models are different to begin with.
Definition source: 16Personalities · Our Framework ↗
Big Five
Five dimensions, considered separately
The Big Five usually describes Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness and Neuroticism. Some scales reverse the last dimension and call it Emotional Stability. Results are usually scores on each dimension, not a division into five types. “Neuroticism” here is a trait name, not a mental health diagnosis.
Big Five names a family of models, not one standard questionnaire. Instruments differ in their items and length. For free options, IPIP’s public-domain items and scales include Big Five measures.
Definition source: IPIP · Big-Five Factor Markers ↗
DISC
Behavioral styles in team communication
DISC often appears in team training and communication courses. In Everything DiSC, for example, the letters stand for Dominance, Influence, Steadiness and Conscientiousness. It focuses on behavior at work, such as communication pace and ways of handling disagreements. In this model, everyone has a mixture of all four styles, with different emphases.
Different providers offer different DISC products, so the name alone does not identify the questionnaire. In a team discussion, it can be a way to talk about the information and cooperation people need. It should not be used to judge ability or suitability for a job.
Definition source: Everything DiSC · What Is the DiSC Model? ↗
Enneagram
A focus on motives
The Enneagram uses the numbers 1 to 9 for nine types and discusses their motives, concerns and ways of responding. Related reading also introduces concepts such as “wings.” It is more concerned with why someone acts than just what they do.
These are explanations within Enneagram theory, not personal psychological mechanisms established by a questionnaire. Even a description that feels familiar cannot establish the cause of a particular behavior.
Definition source: Enneagram Institute · How the System Works ↗
Before comparing two results, note the test names and versions. Scores from different models cannot be converted directly.
Why we built this site
The idea is simple: a personality test you can open and use, with results available as soon as you finish. No payment and no account. 16Personalities, IPIP and Open Psychometrics already offer plenty of free resources. OpenJung is another option.
We also want people to be able to see how their results were calculated. The core scoring code, questionnaire sources and scoring notes are public. If a question is unclear or a result seems wrong, you can point to the specific part that needs work.
The site includes notes and reflection tools, too. When a description reminds you of something that happened, you can write it down. You can also record what does not fit. Coming back does not have to mean taking the test again.
In the workshop
Taking measurements, checking the sketch, fitting the prism into its frame.
How it works
The full test adapts the 32-item OEJTS 1.2 (Open Extended Jungian Type Scales). The site scores the E–I, S–N, T–F and J–P dimensions and presents the corresponding type. Some wording and item directions have been adapted, and translations are provided. The 8-question quick test is a short subset.
The rules are in the core source code and methodology notes. The website uses Astro, React and Tailwind CSS, and runs on Cloudflare Workers.
Evidence, versions and questionnaire license
Evidence and validation status
Traceable source: the full test adapts the 32-item OEJTS 1.2 by Open Psychometrics. The questionnaire PDF documents that version’s items, scoring rules and license. The development page provides item-selection background, not validation of this adaptation.
Not yet published: internal consistency, test–retest reliability and factor validation for this OpenJung version, its 8-question quick test, or its translations. We do not present unsupported reliability coefficients for this implementation.
Some wording and item directions have been adapted. The quick test uses only 2 questions per dimension; scaling it to 8–40 for display does not give it the precision of the full test. Percentages describe a position on a scale, not accuracy or diagnostic probability.
Use results for reflection and communication. Near-midpoint results do not establish a fixed type. Do not use them for hiring, clinical or other high-stakes decisions.
OEJTS questionnaire items and adaptations are licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, not public domain. The MIT license covers original OpenJung code, not the questionnaire.
Current assessment version: openjung-oejts-1
OpenJung is not the official MBTI and is not endorsed by the Myers-Briggs Company or the Myers & Briggs Foundation. Dedicated validation studies have not been published for this implementation, the quick test or the translations. Being free or open source does not make a test more accurate. Results are for reflection, not diagnosis or hiring.
How to use it
Take a test, read the results, or make a note.
-
① Take a test
On the test page, choose the 8-question quick test or the 32-question full test. You can also explore one dimension. Answer based on your usual habits. The quick test is a short introduction, not a result with the same precision as the full test.
-
② Read the results
The results page shows scores for four dimensions and a type description. Percentages show a position on a scale, not accuracy. For results near the midpoint or a letter that changes when you retest, see the results guide.
-
③ Keep a note or share
In your personal space, write a reflection, choose an exercise to try, or do a weekly review. You can also download a result card or share a link. Check what information it contains before sending it to someone else.
For developers, start with the REST API documentation and MCP integration guide. Code and questionnaire reuse have separate license requirements.
Thanks
Thanks to Eric Jorgenson and Open Psychometrics for publishing the OEJTS 1.2 questionnaire, scoring rules and license, which made this adaptation possible. Thanks also to the people maintaining open resources such as IPIP.
The site’s type descriptions draw on the work of Jung, Katharine Cook Briggs and Isabel Briggs Myers. Open-source projects including Astro, React and Tailwind CSS support the website itself. Thanks to their authors and maintainers.
Thanks also to everyone contributing code, translations and feedback. A question with two possible meanings, or an explanation that is hard to follow: specific comments like these help us improve the site.
Original OpenJung core code is MIT-licensed. OEJTS items and adaptations are separately covered by CC BY-NC-SA 4.0; open-source code does not mean the questionnaire can be freely reused commercially. The original questionnaire states its license.
Want to try it? You can start now.
Take the free test