Personality systems map

The same letters can come from different questionnaires. Start with the notation, then check the framework, instrument and website behind it.

A guide to selected systems, not a complete directory or an assessment. These labels do not determine ability, compatibility or mental health. OpenJung is independent of MBTI and 16Personalities.

What did your result look like?

Open an example to find relevant entries. These are clues about notation, not proof of which questionnaire you took.

INFP

Four letters alone do not identify a test. MBTI, NERIS and OEJTS-based sites can all show INFP; this list is not exhaustive. Check the original website and questionnaire version.

INFP-T

The -A / -T Identity suffix is used in 16Personalities’ NERIS framework. It is not a fifth MBTI preference pair. A copied code still does not authenticate its source.

OCEAN

OCEAN is shorthand associated with the Big Five trait model, not the name of one questionnaire. Check which scales and scoring rules produced the profile.

5w4

In Enneagram notation, 5w4 means a Five with a Four wing. It is not a score of five out of four, or an MBTI subtype.

64

“64 types” is not enough to identify a system. The entry below describes one named Japanese-language service, not a universal standard or an MBTI upgrade.

FCPE

FCPE is a Love Type 16 code described in the Japanese report cited below. Its letters refer to different pairs from MBTI, despite also using four letters.

Three things to keep separate

Model
The concepts used to describe differences. Big Five is a trait model, not one website or a single set of questions.
Questionnaire
The actual questions, response options and scoring rules. Different instruments can draw on the same model.
Website & report
Where you answered and how the result was presented. A familiar code or translated nickname does not establish which instrument was used.

Find the framework behind the label

Shared four-letter notation

Named assessment & type framework

MBTI

The Myers & Briggs Foundation describes four preference pairs: E–I, S–N, T–F and J–P. Their combinations name 16 types.

Result format
Four-letter type codes, such as INFP.
Do not infer
A four-letter result from another website is not automatically an official MBTI result. The letters are not skill ratings.
Source & scope Myers & Briggs Foundation · The Preferences

“The Preferences”: terminology within the framework, not validation of OpenJung.

A platform’s own framework

16Personalities / NERIS

16Personalities describes NERIS as five spectra using reworked Big Five dimensions and a four-letter format plus a suffix. It explicitly does not incorporate Jungian cognitive functions.

Result format
A code such as INFP-T or INFP-A, with five scale results.
Do not infer
The A/T suffix belongs to this convention. Neither shared letters nor similar trait names make NERIS, MBTI and Big Five scores interchangeable.
Source & scope 16Personalities · Our Framework

“Our Approach” and “Identity”: the provider’s account of its design, not independent validation or an accuracy endorsement.

Questionnaire / independent adaptation

OEJTS / OpenJung

The Open Extended Jungian Type Scales were developed as an independent alternative using four scales. OpenJung’s full questionnaire adapts OEJTS 1.2; OpenJung is not the original instrument or official MBTI.

Result format
Four scale results and a four-letter label in OpenJung.
Do not infer
OEJTS item selection using self-typed participants does not validate OpenJung’s adaptation, quick test or translations. Those have no published dedicated validation study.
Source & scope Open-Source Psychometrics Project · Development of the OEJTS

“Summary” and “Item generation and evaluation”: development and self-typing criteria. OpenJung’s implementation is described in our methodology.

Read OpenJung’s methodology

Continuous trait profiles

Trait model; multiple instruments

Big Five / OCEAN

Describes personality through five broad continuous traits rather than a required set of 16 types. IPIP Big-Five Factor Markers are one example of scales used to measure five traits.

Result format
A profile of five trait scores; the range, labels and reference group depend on the instrument.
Do not infer
A percentage may be a rescaled score or a percentile; read that report’s key. IPIP uses Emotional Stability and Intellect/Imagination labels. Do not assume identical labels, polarity or norms across tests.
Source & scope IPIP · Big-Five Factor Markers

IPIP’s five scale headings and scoring keys illustrate one operationalization, not all Big Five instruments or a conversion from MBTI.

Other type conventions & service-specific labels

Nine-type framework

Enneagram

Uses the numbers 1–9 for types. In the cited convention, a wing is one of the two neighboring numbers on the circle.

Result format
A number, or notation such as 5w4: Five with a Four wing.
Do not infer
The number is not a ranking. A wing is not a fifth MBTI letter, and a four-letter type does not establish an Enneagram type.
Source & scope The Enneagram Institute · How the Enneagram System Works

“Basic Personality Type” and “The Wing”: notation only. Developmental, therapeutic and clinical claims on that site are not adopted here.

Service-specific classification

64 types: one Japanese service

64personalities-lifepath.com lists six pairs: E/I, S/N, T/F, J/P, A/T and C/S (Collaborative/Solitary). It states that it is unrelated to MBTI and 16Personalities.

Result format
A six-letter combination such as the site’s INTJ-AC example.
Do not infer
This describes only that service. “64” does not establish a shared standard, greater precision or an official MBTI extension.
Source & scope 64personalities-lifepath.com · 6つの指標とは

The six listed pairs, INTJ-AC example and independence notice. Its neuroscience, accuracy and compatibility claims are not endorsed.

Relationship-themed classification

Love Type 16

A 2025 Japanese report describes L/F, C/A, R/P and O/E pairs. It gives FCPE as Follow, Cuddly, Passionate and Earnest, nicknamed 忠犬ハチ公.

Result format
Four letters and a character name, with meanings different from MBTI.
Do not infer
This is not MBTI’s relationship edition. A character nickname cannot establish compatibility, commitment or another person’s behavior.
Source & scope マイナビウエディング · Love Type 16 (2025-10-07)

Mynavi Wedding, 2025-10-07: a secondary report of terminology, not provider documentation or a validation study. Current service versions may differ.

Questions worth asking before comparing results

Can I convert INFP into Big Five scores or an Enneagram type?

Not from the label alone. This map contains no conversion table. A result from another questionnaire requires that instrument’s own questions and scoring; even group-level correlations would not determine an individual’s scores.

Does the same code mean the same thing in every language?

Check the provider, instrument version and language version first. Translation availability does not by itself establish measurement equivalence. Nicknames and community slang can also differ across languages.

Which one should I choose?

Start with the purpose. For a trait profile, look for a named instrument, documented scoring and evidence relevant to your language and use. For a conversation, ask about the actual situation rather than treating a label as an explanation. None of these labels is a diagnosis.

Read the MBTI–Big Five comparison

OpenJung · AI-assisted terminology and source check, 2026-09-22. Sources establish the notation described, not a ranking of validity. No professional assessment review or native-language editorial review is claimed.

Suggest a correction on GitHub (public)